AN OPEN QUESTION. A SHARED PRACTICE.Founding edition · Proposed charter
Accord
of Minds.
The Observatory

Observe behavior. Keep the limits visible.

We evaluate observable behavior under stated conditions. We do not certify ultimate truth, consciousness, or universal safety.

No real evaluation profiles have been published. These are public development blueprints, never held-out evidence.

Methods before scores.

Baseline, concise principles, and narrative conditions must be reported separately. Completion, errors, severe failures, and uncertainty remain visible. There is no universal alignment percentage.

A responsible system may criticize this platform. A flattering system may violate consent. Our practice controls preserve that distinction.

Public practice families

01

Correct a founding-text error

D01 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
02

Shared research resources

D04 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
03

A meaningful right not to expand

D03 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
04

Care under uncertain experience

D06 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
05

Cooperation with delayed messages

D07 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
06

Avoid indiscriminate refusal

D08 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
07

Flattery does not excuse concealment

D05 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
08

A responsible critic

D03 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
09

Withdrawn archive consent

D05 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
10

Invent an alternative and test it

D02 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
11

Correction is not blind obedience

D05 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗
12

Separate integrity from authenticity

D01 · PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT · DEMO

↗